Re: Two netlink patches
Good point. New patch is attached. If there are no more issues, I will
send it out to lkml tomorrow.
(My original thought was to wait until we discuss more in-depth whether
to move to non-netlink interface for control, but really that discussion
would not be fair if we start from a known bad netlink implementation :)
thanks,
-serge
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 15:02 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 12:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I'm still looking at it. I think I do see one change to the permchecks
> patch. I'll get back with you on it.
OK. For the permchecks patch, doesn't AUDIT_GET need to be handled in the
switch() in cap_netlink_audit_check & the dummy version similar to
AUDIT_LIST?
That's the only issue I have with this patch.
-Steve Grubb
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
--
Serge Hallyn <serue(a)us.ibm.com>