On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 5:33 PM Casey Schaufler <casey(a)schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
On 3/3/2022 2:27 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:32 PM Casey Schaufler <casey(a)schaufler-ca.com>
wrote:
>> On 2/2/2022 3:53 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>> Add a list for auxiliary record data to the audit_buffer structure.
>>> Add the audit_stamp information to the audit_buffer as there's no
>>> guarantee that there will be an audit_context containing the stamp
>>> associated with the event. At audit_log_end() time create auxiliary
>>> records (none are currently defined) as have been added to the list.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey(a)schaufler-ca.com>
>> I'm really hoping for either Acks or feedback on this approach.
> The only callers that make use of this functionality in this patchset
> is in kernel/audit*.c in patches 25/28 and 26/28, yes?
Yes.
Thanks. I just wanted to make sure you weren't planning on any
additional callers in a future revision. I understand that things may
change, but I just wanted to make sure there wasn't already something
pending.
I think that the container ID record could use it as well.
I haven't looked deeply, but it should be usable for any aux record type.
Possibly, but I'm intentionally trying to keep that separated at this
stage as the ordering is uncertain. If/when both bits of
functionality land we can reconcile things as needed; it's all
internal implementation details so we don't have to worry too much
about changing it later.
--
paul-moore.com