Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:36:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/21/2015 08:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> This patchset has some important changes from the previous revision, >> namely a fix from Al Viro (included in 2/5) that resolves a boot panic >> on some systems as well as some smaller, less noteworthy fixes found >> in the linux-next announcement thread from January 20th (refcount bump >> in __audit_reusename() and a inode type in __audit_inode()). >> >> This patchset still needs some additional testing to verify that the >> audit code still functions properly (the minor fixes mentioned above) >> and there is an additional patch from Al that should be included as >> well, but I wanted to post this and push the series to the audit next >> branch quickly since a number of folks were affected by the boot panic. >> >> --- >> >> Paul Moore (5): >> fs: rework getname_kernel to handle up to PATH_MAX sized filenames >> fs: create proper filename objects using getname_kernel() >> audit: enable filename recording via getname_kernel() >> audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and __audit_inode_child() >> audit: replace getname()/putname() hacks with reference counters >> > Hi Paul, > > What is the baseline for this patch set ? Obviously -next won't work, > and it does not apply to mainline either. FWIW, I've ported that on top of vfs.git#for-next; result is in vfs.git#experimental. Paul, are you OK with that one?