Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates

On 1/27/23 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk&gt; wrote: >> On 1/27/23 12:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk&gt; wrote: >>>> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: >>>>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections suggested in >>>>> consultation with Steve Grubb. >>>>> >>>>> Richard Guy Briggs (2): >>>>> io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE >>>>> io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR >>>>> >>>>> io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++- >>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, just >>>> to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6.3. >>> >>> Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ... >> >> I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it >> simmer until people have had a chance to do so. > > Thanks. FWIW, that sounds very reasonable to me, but I've seen lots > of different behaviors across subsystems and wanted to make sure we > were on the same page. Sounds fair. BTW, can we stop CC'ing closed lists on patch submissions? Getting these: Your message to Linux-audit awaits moderator approval on every reply is really annoying.