On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 18:53 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2021 5:55:44 PM EST Burn Alting wrote:
> > > How is the following for a way forward.
> > > a. I will author a patch to the user space code to correctly parse this
> > > condition and submit it on the weekend. It will be via a new
> > > configuration item to auditd.conf just in case placing a fixed
> > > extended timeout (15-20 secs) affects memory usage for users of the
> > > auparse library. This solves the initial problem of ausearch/auparse
> > > failing to parse generated audit.b. I am happy to instrument what ever
> > > is recommended on my hosts at home (vm's and bare metal) to provide
> > > more information, should we want to 'explain' the occurrence,
given I
> > > see this every week or two and report back.
> >
> > Seems reasonable to me.
>
> I can implement the 'end_of_event_timeout' change either as
> i. a command line argument to ausearch/aureport (say --eoetmo secs) and a
> new pair of library functions within the auparse() stable (say
> auparse_set_eoe_timeout() and auparse_get_eoe_timeout())
> or
> ii. a configuration item in /etc/audit/auditd.conf, or
>
>
> Which is your preference? Mine is i. as this is a user space processing
> change, not a demon change.
To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what we're seeing. I run some tests today
on my system. It's seeing issues also. I'd still like to treat the root cause
of this. But we do need to change the default. That I what I'm trying to
figure out.
Back to your question, I'm wondering if we should do both? A changeable
default in auditd.conf and an override on the command line.
So far, all items in /etc/audit/auditd.conf appear to only affect the daemon. Is
this the right location to start adding non-daemon configuration items? (I accept
there is no other place).
Happy to do both, if required.
-Steve