On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> wrote:
Currently, the audit tree code does not make sure that when a chunk
in
inserted into the hash table, it is fully initialized. So in theory (in
practice only on DEC Alpha) a user of RCU lookup could see uninitialized
structure in the hash table and crash. Add appropriate barriers between
initialization of the structure and its insertion into hash table.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
---
kernel/audit_tree.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
index 89ad8857a578..46cc6d046c75 100644
--- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
+++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
@@ -198,7 +198,11 @@ struct audit_chunk *audit_tree_lookup(const struct inode *inode)
struct audit_chunk *p;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, list, hash) {
- if (p->key == key) {
+ /*
+ * We use a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() to make sure
+ * the chunk we see is fully initialized.
+ */
+ if (READ_ONCE(p->key) == key) {
atomic_long_inc(&p->refs);
return p;
}
@@ -303,9 +307,15 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
list_replace_init(&chunk->owners[j].list,
&new->owners[i].list);
}
- list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
list_for_each_entry(owner, &new->trees, same_root)
owner->root = new;
+ /*
+ * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+ * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+ * audit_tree_lookup().
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
@@ -367,6 +377,12 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree
*tree)
list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
}
chunk->key = inode_to_key(inode);
+ /*
+ * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+ * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+ * audit_tree_lookup().
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
insert_hash(chunk);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
@@ -458,7 +474,6 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
p->owner = tree;
get_tree(tree);
list_add(&p->list, &tree->chunks);
- list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
list_for_each_entry(owner, &chunk->trees, same_root)
owner->root = chunk;
old->dead = 1;
@@ -466,6 +481,13 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
tree->root = chunk;
list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
}
+ /*
+ * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+ * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+ * audit_tree_lookup().
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
IMO, now that list_replace_rcu() is no longer a one liner (including the wmb and
comment above) it would be cleaner to have a helper update_hash(old, chunk)
right next to insert_hash() and for the same reason smp_wmb with the comment
should go into insert_hash() helpler.
Thanks,
Amir.