You can enable the syscalls that you think will be helpful from an IDS perspective. 

There are also other downstream tools like goaudit and OSS kernel modules like sysdig falco (not related to auditd) which may be able to simplify things for you. 

Farhan

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 6:25 AM 杨海 <hai.yang@magic-shield.com> wrote:
Hi Steve,

I ever read the document you wrote about laying IDS on top of auditd. And I suppose inotify could be lightweight for IDS. Any comment?

Best regards
Hai

 
------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Steve Grubb"<sgrubb@redhat.com>;
Date:  Fri, Jul 12, 2019 08:14 PM
To:  "linux-audit"<linux-audit@redhat.com>;
Cc:  "杨海"<hai.yang@magic-shield.com>;
Subject:  Re: overhead of auditd
 
Hello,

On Thursday, July 11, 2019 11:23:45 PM EDT 杨海 wrote:
> Turning on all system calls in audit.rules, and transferring a tar file to
> the target system (CentOS 7, 4 cores), I found "auditd" consumes high CPU
> usage. Is it expected?

It would not be surprising. Some system calls have more overhead than others.
So, depending on everything that is running, you can kill your system.

> BTW, after turning write-logs off, and add dispatcher, both "audispd" and
> "auditd" are consuming high CPU.

They have a lot of events to handle.

-Steve

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit